Homosexual Relationships Involving The Great Deities And...

Many of us grew up enjoying the myths and legends about Greek gods, mortals, and monsters that have been enjoyed by adults and children around the world for thousands of years. But not many, if any, would remember ever reading about homosexual relationships involving the great deities and brave heroes. In facts, those pieces of information were considered by our moral standards unappropriated and negligible, such that they had to be distorted in some way before the stories reach the public. The Greeks in Plato’s Symposium, however, are loud and proud of their homosexuality. Some argue that same-sex romance is the ideal and most honorable example of love since it guides the lover and the beloved to achieve the highest goods of life – wisdom†¦show more content†¦These relationships, though there were exceptions, were relatively short-lived. They usually ended once the eromenos had crossed the threshold into adulthood, and, as the result, their romantic relationsh ip turned into friendship. It is not exaggerated to say that male homosexual relationship held a very important position in ancient Greek culture for it had extensive influence on a large part of their social life: in politics, education, history, and mythology. With this in mind, it is no surprise for this practice to be brought up and idealized as the paradigmatic example of Eros in the Symposium. One method the orators use to do this was to subordinate heterosexual relationship and give male homosexual engagement superior and divine qualities. In Pausanias’ speech, he associates male/female romance with the Common Aphrodite’s Love and male/male romance with the Heavenly Aphrodite’s Love (14, 181B-181D). The Love of Common Aphrodite, Pausanias argues, is â€Å"vulgar† because it is based on mere impulse and erotic desires (14, 181B). Participants in this kind of love, men who chase after women, are controlled by lust and, therefore, unable to see pass the physical beauty of the bo dy. On the other hand, the Love of Heavenly

Bio-Weapons Free Essays

Chlorine gas was used during the war a lot. Chlorine gas was first used April 22 191 5 at leper in Belgium. There were many ways of use of the gas for example; artillery shells, mortar projectiles, aerial bombs tank sprays and landmines were used to spread the chemicals around. We will write a custom essay sample on Bio-Weapons or any similar topic only for you Order Now During the Cold War the United Stated and Russia had enough chemical weapons to wipeout most animal and plant life on earth. Blologlcal weapons were deployed In various ways to gain strategic or tactical advantage over an advisory. The united States developed an anti-crop capability that used bio-herbicides or myco-herbicides to destroy enemy agriculture. Fisheries and water-based vegetation was also targeted. Wheat blast and rice blast were weaoponized in aerial tanks and cluster bombs to deliver to enemy water sheds. Even though herbicides are chemicals they are grouped with biological warfare and chemical warfare because they work the same as blotoxlns and ioregulators. Japan poisoned Chinese water wells to study how many people got Typhus and other diseases. Germany also used bioweapons at the beginning of the Second World War. Oplnlon/Crltlque: In my opinion bioweapons were both good and bad but I think that they were mostly bad. The bad toxins that are Inside somebody can get Into their genes and be passed on to their child If they have any. If there Is a child and one of the parents have toxins in them the child can come out looking deformed and mutated. How to cite Bio-Weapons, Papers

Is Welfare in Keeping with the Norms of Social Jus Essay Example For Students

Is Welfare in Keeping with the Norms of Social Jus Essay ticeIs Welfare in Keeping with the Norms of Social Justice?In order to answer this question we must first begin with the starting point of all Catholic Social Teaching; the dignity of the human person. All social action, and activities, between individuals, lesser organizations, and the governing body must seek the common good of all society and of the individual person. The common good is that objective moral standard which takes into account the whole of man and woman in their material and spiritual nature. Thus by its very definition the common good upholds the dignity of the human person. The norms of social justice require that the common good be served on all social levels. What does this have to do with welfare? Well, the question ultimately comes back to whether or not welfare serves the common good of all society and by doing so, safeguards the dignity of the human person. What follows is an attempt to prove that welfare (at least my understanding of it) is not in keeping with the norms of social justice. Welfare in this country today does not require the recipient to labor for the goods he receives. Instead based on the amount of labor an individual does not put into the economy, the government provides housing and other basic necessities for that same individual. To labor is to make use of nature by responsible cultivation of it in order to meet our immediate needs. Labor therefore serves the common good by helping the person to grow and develop thereby upholding human dignity. Having ones basic needs met without labor then does not seem to be in keeping with norms of social justice, because it denies the personal dimension of labor which is the opportunity to grow and develop in their personhood and their role of sovereignty over creation. This personal dimension, which is denied in welfare, is an expression of the person being made in the image and likeness of God. Also within the welfare system, the government still retains ownership of the goods it supplies. It provides housing and other basic needs but provides no way for these impoverished to come into ownership of their own property. This too denies the dignity of the human person to whom it is given the fundamental right to the use of earthly goods. This right is the natural foundation of a livelihood, and to that right corresponds the right to private possession of property. Private ownership of property provides stability, security to the individual and again causes the individual to grow in his God-given role of sovereignty over creation. To allow a man or woman use of earthly goods without a real possibility of ownership denies them the dignity that is theirs through the right that is theirs of coming into possession of a small piece of the created world. This does not serve the common good because it gives the appearance of helping individuals come into a share of the economy, and of having their needs met while stripping them of the dignity that comes with doing it for themselves. The welfare sys tem then, cannot be in line with the norms of social justice because it does not seek the common good and can therefore not safeguard the human dignity of the person. A real welfare system in the true sense of the word would seek the common good of all society and every individual by offering means of employment at a just and living wage so that individuals and families can provide for themselves by labor and thereby come into a share of private property. .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed , .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .postImageUrl , .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed , .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed:hover , .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed:visited , .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed:active { border:0!important; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed:active , .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2957190d915e8f4f7324adee1edc42ed:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Women And Honor Essay AnalysisBibliography: